In social science and politics , power is the capacity of an individual to influence the actions, beliefs, or conduct behaviour of others. The term authority is often used for power that is perceived as legitimate by the social structure , not to be confused with authoritarianism. One can regard power as evil or unjust ; however, power can also be seen as good and as something inherited or given for exercising humanistic objectives that will help, move, and empower others as well. In general, power derives from the factors of interdependence between two entities and the environment.
Ethical Anthropocentrism: Making Environmentalism Relatable
Courage Essay - Words | Bartleby
Why have Republican leaders abandoned their principles in support of an immoral and dangerous president? O n a cold March afternoon in , Wolfgang Leonhard slipped out of the East German Communist Party Secretariat, hurried home, packed what few warm clothes he could fit into a small briefcase, and then walked to a telephone box to call his mother. That was the code they had agreed on in advance. It meant that he was escaping the country, at great risk to his life. To hear more feature stories, get the Audm iPhone app. Though only 28 years old at the time, Leonhard stood at the pinnacle of the new East German elite. The son of German Communists, he had been educated in the Soviet Union, trained in special schools during the war, and brought back to Berlin from Moscow in May , on the same airplane that carried Walter Ulbricht, the leader of what would soon become the East German Communist Party.
Power (social and political)
Jump to navigation. In doing so, it must define the relationship humans have with the environment in relatable terms, which—according to some environmental ethicists—is made difficult by the very nature of ethics itself. John Benson, another ethicist, describes this problem in his book Environmental Ethics: An Introduction with Readings. This kind of anthropocentric outlook, however, may be seen as a powerful way to assign significance to environmental issues.
Coercion theory is one of the most fully developed bodies of theory in the social sciences, one that has advanced the field of national security by illuminating the logic that underlies threats, violence, and war. This is a problem for civil-military communication, and, more generally, for national strategy and military outcomes. On those occasions when they encounter coercion theory, military practitioners are often instinctively wary of it. In general, they tend to be skeptical that theories produced by academics can help them understand war, which they believe is their dominion.