In bioethics , the ethics of cloning refers to a variety of ethical positions regarding the practice and possibilities of cloning , especially human cloning. While many of these views are religious in origin, some of the questions raised by cloning are faced by secular perspectives as well. Perspectives on human cloning are theoretical, as human therapeutic and reproductive cloning are not commercially used; animals are currently cloned in laboratories and in livestock production. Advocates support the development of therapeutic cloning in order to generate tissues and whole organs to treat patients who otherwise cannot obtain transplants, to avoid the need for immunosuppressive drugs , and to stave off the effects of aging. Advocates for reproductive cloning believe that parents who cannot otherwise procreate should have access to technology.
Is Cloning Good Or Harmful? Essay - Words | Bartleby
Human Cloning This article was about human cloning. For this article to be a strong argument it has to prove its point and have lots of details. The topic of my article is cloning. This article is trying to prove that cloning is the right thing to do.
The Cloning Debate The first attempt in cloning was conducted in on a group of frogs. The experiment was a partial success. The frog cells were cloned into other living frogs however, only one in every thousand developed normally , all of which were sterile.
Cloning should be banned and illegal because neither the animal or human gets the same personalities and can mess them up forever. One argument about cloning is the personality of either the human or animal will be different. Depending on the type of cloning someone uses, it can either be reproductive or therapeutic. An Argument Against Cloning Increase in genetic knowledge has created challenges in our society.